Banks move toward resolution of lawsuit

A settlement is in the works to end a class action lawsuit tied to a massive Richmond banking deal.

StellarOne Bank and locally based Union First Market Bankshares have reached a settlement in principle with a StellarOne shareholder who filed suit this summer to block the banks’ pending $445.1 million combination or win damages.

The Union First Market Bank headquarters in Richmond.

Union’s Richmond headquarters. (RBS photos)

Both sides are in the process of finalizing an agreement, according to federal court records. No specifics of the settlement have been disclosed.

Resolving the case would help clear the way for the deal, which is expected to close in January and has been approved by state and federal regulators. Union shareholders are set to vote on the proposal Dec. 5.

As proposed, Union will acquire StellarOne and its Charlottesville parent company. StellarOne shareholders would receive 0.97 shares of Union common stock for each of their StellarOne shares.

The StellarOne branch at 11450 Robious Road. (Photo by Michael Schwartz)

The StellarOne branch at 11450 Robious Road.

The combination would result in a $7 billion bank with more than 120 branches covering much of Virginia and with its headquarters in downtown Richmond.

The lawsuit was filed June 14 against StellarOne, its board of directors and Union First Market by StellarOne shareholder Jaclyn Crescente on behalf of herself and her fellow shareholders.

News of the pending acquisition brought out a gang of class action lawyers from across the country in search of potential disgruntled plaintiffs. The New York firm of Faruqi & Faruqi was able to coral Crescente as a lead plaintiff.

Crescente’s case alleges that StellarOne Corp., the Charlottesville-based parent of StellarOne Bank, along with 13 of its directors breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders by engaging in the pending deal.

The suit alleges that the merger process was flawed and the deal will unfairly deprive Crescente and other StellarOne shareholders of the true value of their investment in the bank.

Union is named as defendant in the suit for “aiding and abetting” StellarOne’s alleged breach of fiduciary duty.

Both banks have filed motions to have the case tossed out.

Union’s motion for dismissal filed July 26 called the suit “ludicrous” and “woeful.” StellarOne said it was “hastily-filed” and without merit.

Such suits are common on the heels of large merger and acquisition announcements.

Union is represented in the case by LeClairRyan attorneys Charles Sims and Michele Burke.

Alan Wingfield and H. Scott Kelly from the Richmond office of Troutman Sanders represent StellarOne.

A settlement is in the works to end a class action lawsuit tied to a massive Richmond banking deal.

StellarOne Bank and locally based Union First Market Bankshares have reached a settlement in principle with a StellarOne shareholder who filed suit this summer to block the banks’ pending $445.1 million combination or win damages.

The Union First Market Bank headquarters in Richmond.

Union’s Richmond headquarters. (RBS photos)

Both sides are in the process of finalizing an agreement, according to federal court records. No specifics of the settlement have been disclosed.

Resolving the case would help clear the way for the deal, which is expected to close in January and has been approved by state and federal regulators. Union shareholders are set to vote on the proposal Dec. 5.

As proposed, Union will acquire StellarOne and its Charlottesville parent company. StellarOne shareholders would receive 0.97 shares of Union common stock for each of their StellarOne shares.

The StellarOne branch at 11450 Robious Road. (Photo by Michael Schwartz)

The StellarOne branch at 11450 Robious Road.

The combination would result in a $7 billion bank with more than 120 branches covering much of Virginia and with its headquarters in downtown Richmond.

The lawsuit was filed June 14 against StellarOne, its board of directors and Union First Market by StellarOne shareholder Jaclyn Crescente on behalf of herself and her fellow shareholders.

News of the pending acquisition brought out a gang of class action lawyers from across the country in search of potential disgruntled plaintiffs. The New York firm of Faruqi & Faruqi was able to coral Crescente as a lead plaintiff.

Crescente’s case alleges that StellarOne Corp., the Charlottesville-based parent of StellarOne Bank, along with 13 of its directors breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders by engaging in the pending deal.

The suit alleges that the merger process was flawed and the deal will unfairly deprive Crescente and other StellarOne shareholders of the true value of their investment in the bank.

Union is named as defendant in the suit for “aiding and abetting” StellarOne’s alleged breach of fiduciary duty.

Both banks have filed motions to have the case tossed out.

Union’s motion for dismissal filed July 26 called the suit “ludicrous” and “woeful.” StellarOne said it was “hastily-filed” and without merit.

Such suits are common on the heels of large merger and acquisition announcements.

Union is represented in the case by LeClairRyan attorneys Charles Sims and Michele Burke.

Alan Wingfield and H. Scott Kelly from the Richmond office of Troutman Sanders represent StellarOne.

Your subscription has expired. Renew now by choosing a subscription below!

For more informaiton, head over to your profile.

Profile


SUBSCRIBE NOW

TERMS OF SERVICE:

ALL MEMBERSHIPS RENEW AUTOMATICALLY. YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR A 1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL AT THE RATE IN EFFECT AT THAT TIME UNLESS YOU CANCEL YOUR MEMBERSHIP BY LOGGING IN OR BY CONTACTING [email protected]

ALL CHARGES FOR MONTHLY OR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS ARE NONREFUNDABLE.

EACH MEMBERSHIP WILL ONLY FUNCTION ON UP TO 3 MACHINES. ACCOUNTS ABUSING THAT LIMIT WILL BE DISCONTINUED.




Return to Homepage

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments