Proposed tech park near Moseley heads to Chesterfield Planning Commission

uppermag1 002

The county-initiated rezoning of the Upper Magnolia Green property would pave the way for a technology park and high school on 1,700 acres near Moseley on the western side of a proposed Powhite Parkway extension. Images courtesy of Chesterfield County.

Planning commissioners are slated to weigh a proposed new technology park in western Chesterfield Tuesday, after months of public meetings and against a backdrop of opposition from some county residents.

The county-initiated proposal would rezone a total of around 2,400 acres, teeing up a technology park on the bulk of the land as well as hundreds of homes and several public facilities on the so-called “Upper Magnolia Green” property.

The technology park would be built on a 1,700-acre site to the west of a proposed Powhite Parkway extension and would include about 100 acres of public facilities. To the east, and handled in a separate rezoning case, would be about 700 acres designated for single-family homes and more public facilities.

Both cases are scheduled for commissioners’ consideration Tuesday. The Planning Commission’s votes will be on whether to recommend the Board of Supervisors vote to give final approval to the rezoning cases.

Chesterfield officials pitched the original vision of the project late last year as a hub of manufacturing, light industrial and research companies that would employ nearby residents of what’s one of the fastest-growing parts of the county.

Though there have been tweaks, the vision has largely held true in preceding months of public information meetings despite criticisms from some county residents opposed to the project.

The proposed new zoning, general industrial (I-2), would allow more than 200 uses by-right or with restrictions, the county has restricted development of the technology park to seven principal uses and four accessory uses.

Those principal uses are proposed to be computer equipment manufacturing, data centers, electronic component and accessories manufacturing, laboratories, offices, pharmaceutical products manufacturing and research and development facilities.

Accessory uses include plastic products manufacturing and warehouses. Plastic products manufacturing was originally among the original primary uses but public opposition motivated a paring back of its presence at the park.

Building heights would be limited to a total of 150 feet, or 13 stories. Telecommunication infrastructure and water tanks would be exempt, according to the staff report.

The proposed technology park portion has shrunk to 1,600 acres since its initial plan, as county officials shaved off about 100 acres to put a high school and fire station into the proposal for the western side of the project based on public feedback.

County officials have increased the park’s buffers after criticism from nearby residents of the initial buffer plan. The change effectively further decreases the usable space at the technology park.

uppermag2 002

In addition to the technology park proposed as part of the Upper Magnolia Green project, a separate rezoning request would allow construction of 600 single-family homes and public facilities on the east side of the project area, shown here.

The combined buffer areas will occupy about 380 acres, which is about 24 percent of the overall technology park site. There would also be a buffer along the proposed Powhite Parkway extension.

That’s due to the new proposed buffers of 750 feet intended to provide a wooded screen for existing homes to the west of the technology park. The measurement starts at a given house, rather than its property line, so it’s a more variable and tailored buffer than would be seen in other development projects. Assistant Planning Director Stephen Donohoe said in an interview last month that the buffer exceeds any existing county land-use standard.

“If your house is 100 feet from your own property line, you have 650 of buffer from the project,” Donohoe said. “That’s really substantial and something I’m not sure has been done before.”

Prior to the approval of plans tied to development of facilities in the park, the county would be required to hash out a plan to build a four-lane divided extension of Powhite Parkway to Route 360, along with a financing plan and project timeline, that would have to be approved by the Board of Supervisors, according to the staff report.

The county has said that the technology park’s creation would increase the likelihood that the county could secure funding to build the road extension. The county pegged the cost of the extension at more than $700 million, according to a January post on Chesterfield On Point, a county-run blog.

The 700-acre eastern portion of the project area would be occupied by up to 600 lots for single-family detached homes on 550 acres. The remaining 150 acres would be home to a middle school and library and potentially an elementary school, according to the rezoning case’s staff report.

The total assemblage is comprised largely of property the Economic Development Authority bought in 2020. An additional 600 acres not owned by the county is also included in the proposal.

uppermag1 002

The county-initiated rezoning of the Upper Magnolia Green property would pave the way for a technology park and high school on 1,700 acres near Moseley on the western side of a proposed Powhite Parkway extension. Images courtesy of Chesterfield County.

Planning commissioners are slated to weigh a proposed new technology park in western Chesterfield Tuesday, after months of public meetings and against a backdrop of opposition from some county residents.

The county-initiated proposal would rezone a total of around 2,400 acres, teeing up a technology park on the bulk of the land as well as hundreds of homes and several public facilities on the so-called “Upper Magnolia Green” property.

The technology park would be built on a 1,700-acre site to the west of a proposed Powhite Parkway extension and would include about 100 acres of public facilities. To the east, and handled in a separate rezoning case, would be about 700 acres designated for single-family homes and more public facilities.

Both cases are scheduled for commissioners’ consideration Tuesday. The Planning Commission’s votes will be on whether to recommend the Board of Supervisors vote to give final approval to the rezoning cases.

Chesterfield officials pitched the original vision of the project late last year as a hub of manufacturing, light industrial and research companies that would employ nearby residents of what’s one of the fastest-growing parts of the county.

Though there have been tweaks, the vision has largely held true in preceding months of public information meetings despite criticisms from some county residents opposed to the project.

The proposed new zoning, general industrial (I-2), would allow more than 200 uses by-right or with restrictions, the county has restricted development of the technology park to seven principal uses and four accessory uses.

Those principal uses are proposed to be computer equipment manufacturing, data centers, electronic component and accessories manufacturing, laboratories, offices, pharmaceutical products manufacturing and research and development facilities.

Accessory uses include plastic products manufacturing and warehouses. Plastic products manufacturing was originally among the original primary uses but public opposition motivated a paring back of its presence at the park.

Building heights would be limited to a total of 150 feet, or 13 stories. Telecommunication infrastructure and water tanks would be exempt, according to the staff report.

The proposed technology park portion has shrunk to 1,600 acres since its initial plan, as county officials shaved off about 100 acres to put a high school and fire station into the proposal for the western side of the project based on public feedback.

County officials have increased the park’s buffers after criticism from nearby residents of the initial buffer plan. The change effectively further decreases the usable space at the technology park.

uppermag2 002

In addition to the technology park proposed as part of the Upper Magnolia Green project, a separate rezoning request would allow construction of 600 single-family homes and public facilities on the east side of the project area, shown here.

The combined buffer areas will occupy about 380 acres, which is about 24 percent of the overall technology park site. There would also be a buffer along the proposed Powhite Parkway extension.

That’s due to the new proposed buffers of 750 feet intended to provide a wooded screen for existing homes to the west of the technology park. The measurement starts at a given house, rather than its property line, so it’s a more variable and tailored buffer than would be seen in other development projects. Assistant Planning Director Stephen Donohoe said in an interview last month that the buffer exceeds any existing county land-use standard.

“If your house is 100 feet from your own property line, you have 650 of buffer from the project,” Donohoe said. “That’s really substantial and something I’m not sure has been done before.”

Prior to the approval of plans tied to development of facilities in the park, the county would be required to hash out a plan to build a four-lane divided extension of Powhite Parkway to Route 360, along with a financing plan and project timeline, that would have to be approved by the Board of Supervisors, according to the staff report.

The county has said that the technology park’s creation would increase the likelihood that the county could secure funding to build the road extension. The county pegged the cost of the extension at more than $700 million, according to a January post on Chesterfield On Point, a county-run blog.

The 700-acre eastern portion of the project area would be occupied by up to 600 lots for single-family detached homes on 550 acres. The remaining 150 acres would be home to a middle school and library and potentially an elementary school, according to the rezoning case’s staff report.

The total assemblage is comprised largely of property the Economic Development Authority bought in 2020. An additional 600 acres not owned by the county is also included in the proposal.

Your subscription has expired. Renew now by choosing a subscription below!

For more informaiton, head over to your profile.

Profile


SUBSCRIBE NOW

 — 

 — 

 — 

TERMS OF SERVICE:

ALL MEMBERSHIPS RENEW AUTOMATICALLY. YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR A 1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL AT THE RATE IN EFFECT AT THAT TIME UNLESS YOU CANCEL YOUR MEMBERSHIP BY LOGGING IN OR BY CONTACTING [email protected].

ALL CHARGES FOR MONTHLY OR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS ARE NONREFUNDABLE.

EACH MEMBERSHIP WILL ONLY FUNCTION ON UP TO 3 MACHINES. ACCOUNTS ABUSING THAT LIMIT WILL BE DISCONTINUED.

FOR ASSISTANCE WITH YOUR MEMBERSHIP PLEASE EMAIL [email protected]




Return to Homepage

POSTED IN Government, Commercial Real Estate

Editor's Picks

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leon Phoenix
Leon Phoenix
1 year ago

Uh… no.

Ian Coleman
Ian Coleman
1 year ago
Reply to  Leon Phoenix

Care to explain why you are opposed?

Leon Phoenix
Leon Phoenix
1 year ago
Reply to  Leon Phoenix

I think all the developers and stakeholders just voted me down.

Why am I apposed to this? It’s that oh-so-hard to monetize thing called quality of life.

Who benefits from this? The residents? The kids? The environment? The people living along Woodridge, etc.? Or is it the developers and stakeholders?

Live in Northern Virginia for a while and you’ll see what I mean. More noise, traffic, air pollution, fewer trees. No thanks.

David Humphrey
David Humphrey
1 year ago
Reply to  Leon Phoenix

Do you live in a house built before 1950?

Matt Faris
Matt Faris
1 year ago
Reply to  Leon Phoenix

I’ll answer:Who benefits from this? The residents? YES.The kids? Absolutely!The environment? You bet! The people living along Woodridge, etc.? Oh, heck yeah.Or is it the developers and stakeholders? Hopefully. They’re the ones who risked and contributed the most.

I suspect you have little idea how much land, money and infrastructure has been and will coninue to be financed by the “developers and stakeholders”. I’ll anxiuousy await the downvotes!

Eric Terry
Eric Terry
1 year ago

It is if they invest in the roads to support this. You must complete the Powhite Pkwy extension as the current roads wont support this. The transportation plan is flawed

Daniel Graves
Daniel Graves
1 year ago

Wow……next thing you know the state will sell off Pocahontas State Park to a developer. This county is going to he[[ in a hand basket. The tax paying residents don’t want it, just a few rich developers in bed with the hands that feed them (county officials).