
Mayor Danny Avula responds to questions from Councilmember Sarah Abubaker and attendees at Wednesday’s district meeting. (Jonathan Spiers photo)
After weeks of debate among City Councilmembers and administrators over potential adjustments to Richmond’s proposed budget, Mayor Danny Avula got a chance to weigh in and defend his spending plan in a friendly but sometimes feisty face-to-face with one of its most vocal critics.
Avula found himself in the hot seat Wednesday at a Fourth District meeting hosted by Sarah Abubaker. She and fellow council newcomer Kenya Gibson of the Third District have been critical of the $3 billion budget proposal and the process to review it.
Abubaker and Gibson have argued that the plan should not include across-the-board pay raises for city employees while reducing funding for nonprofits and other council priorities.
They’ve also been critical of the raises for the city’s highest paid administrators, with Abubaker calling for smaller or no raises for most nonunion employees with salaries above $150,000.
That suggestion and others have been met with pushback by city administrators and budget writers, who maintain that the raises of 3.25% or more are needed to keep the city competitive with salaries of comparable positions in state government or neighboring counties.
In an unusual display at a meeting Monday night, nearly a dozen department heads addressed council in a public hearing to speak in support of keeping the raises, taking turns at the podium alongside citizen speakers and others requesting funding for several nonprofit groups left out of the budget.

Doug Gernat, deputy director of IT for Richmond, was among the city department heads who addressed council in Monday’s hearing. (Screenshot)
At her district meeting Wednesday evening at Stony Point Fashion Park, Abubaker reiterated a question she posed Monday to administrators, this time to Avula directly, of whether Richmond is in a budget crisis.
“If you look at the exponential growth of the top range of salaries in the City of Richmond over the last five years, quite candidly it has exploded,” she said, referring to data that, since 2022, the number of city employees making over $200,000 a year has grown from four to over 40.
“I value the perspective of we need to be competitive, and these are merit-driven jobs that take some skill. That being said, my point is either we’re in a budget crisis or we’re not,” Abubaker said.
Avula, who is in his fourth month as mayor and has been making the rounds in recent weeks at other councilmembers’ district meetings, responded that he wanted to “dispel the idea that we’re in a budget crisis.”
“The reality is that we had $50 million more in revenue this year in the city,” he said. “That’s a really good indicator. It means that Richmond is growing, and we are capturing more tax revenue, we are seeing population growth.
“The thing that I heard more than anything on the campaign trail was, one, housing affordability; two, frustration with City Hall. How do you fix frustration with City Hall? It has got to be an investment in our people, in our systems, and we’ve got to build a better organization,” he said. “As the executive of the organization, my best tool to build a better organization is the ability to recruit and retain the best talent possible.”
Avula credited the city’s recent switch to the Virginia Retirement System for boosting recruitment, and he noted last year’s collective bargaining agreements that require a minimum of 3.25% across-the-board raises. For comparison, the current FY25 budget allocated a 4% raise for all city employees, and the FY24 budget included an 8% raise for most employees.
Regarding selective raises, Avula said he would not support raises for union workers and not nonunion workers, nor would he support restricting raises from higher paid positions.
“I will never support disparate raises for union versus nonunion. Whatever we’re doing for unionized employees we’re going to be doing for employees across the board,” he said. “I have the real situation of having to compete in a market. If we are treating our employees, even our senior employees, differently than the state or surrounding counties, we’re going to lose out on talent.”
Avula acknowledged that the budget includes his own pay raise, with the mayor’s salary set to increase from about $130,000 to $175,000. Councilmembers’ salaries are also set to increase, by $20,000 to $45,000 per member. Officials have said salaries for Richmond’s elected officials have remained largely unchanged for two decades and the higher mayor’s salary still falls below where it would be with cost-of-living adjustments over the past 20 years.
In attendance at Wednesday’s meeting was Councilmember Reva Trammell, whose Eighth District also makes up part of Richmond’s Southside. At Monday’s hearing on councilmembers’ proposed amendments to the budget, Trammell defended the higher salaries for the city’s top employees.
“I’m sick of hearing $200,000, $300,000. They work seven days a week,” Trammell said Monday.
Since Avula presented the budget in late March, council has held several budget workshops that stretched hours longer than originally scheduled. The additional time was requested by Abubaker, Gibson and others who maintained that the process should allow more time for council to review the budget document and suggest changes. Avula agreed when Abubaker reiterated that Wednesday.
“Part of the problem being on council,” she told the mayor, “is that we get a 605-page document and we’ve got essentially 10 days to do this analysis, and quite frankly, it’s my understanding it’s not always done.”
An additional budget workshop is scheduled Monday at 1 p.m. to resume discussions about council’s proposed amendments. Amendments are to be introduced at a meeting May 5 at 4 p.m., and a final public hearing is to be held May 12, when council is expected to vote on the budget. State law requires the city to adopt a budget before July 1, the start of the fiscal year.

Mayor Danny Avula responds to questions from Councilmember Sarah Abubaker and attendees at Wednesday’s district meeting. (Jonathan Spiers photo)
After weeks of debate among City Councilmembers and administrators over potential adjustments to Richmond’s proposed budget, Mayor Danny Avula got a chance to weigh in and defend his spending plan in a friendly but sometimes feisty face-to-face with one of its most vocal critics.
Avula found himself in the hot seat Wednesday at a Fourth District meeting hosted by Sarah Abubaker. She and fellow council newcomer Kenya Gibson of the Third District have been critical of the $3 billion budget proposal and the process to review it.
Abubaker and Gibson have argued that the plan should not include across-the-board pay raises for city employees while reducing funding for nonprofits and other council priorities.
They’ve also been critical of the raises for the city’s highest paid administrators, with Abubaker calling for smaller or no raises for most nonunion employees with salaries above $150,000.
That suggestion and others have been met with pushback by city administrators and budget writers, who maintain that the raises of 3.25% or more are needed to keep the city competitive with salaries of comparable positions in state government or neighboring counties.
In an unusual display at a meeting Monday night, nearly a dozen department heads addressed council in a public hearing to speak in support of keeping the raises, taking turns at the podium alongside citizen speakers and others requesting funding for several nonprofit groups left out of the budget.

Doug Gernat, deputy director of IT for Richmond, was among the city department heads who addressed council in Monday’s hearing. (Screenshot)
At her district meeting Wednesday evening at Stony Point Fashion Park, Abubaker reiterated a question she posed Monday to administrators, this time to Avula directly, of whether Richmond is in a budget crisis.
“If you look at the exponential growth of the top range of salaries in the City of Richmond over the last five years, quite candidly it has exploded,” she said, referring to data that, since 2022, the number of city employees making over $200,000 a year has grown from four to over 40.
“I value the perspective of we need to be competitive, and these are merit-driven jobs that take some skill. That being said, my point is either we’re in a budget crisis or we’re not,” Abubaker said.
Avula, who is in his fourth month as mayor and has been making the rounds in recent weeks at other councilmembers’ district meetings, responded that he wanted to “dispel the idea that we’re in a budget crisis.”
“The reality is that we had $50 million more in revenue this year in the city,” he said. “That’s a really good indicator. It means that Richmond is growing, and we are capturing more tax revenue, we are seeing population growth.
“The thing that I heard more than anything on the campaign trail was, one, housing affordability; two, frustration with City Hall. How do you fix frustration with City Hall? It has got to be an investment in our people, in our systems, and we’ve got to build a better organization,” he said. “As the executive of the organization, my best tool to build a better organization is the ability to recruit and retain the best talent possible.”
Avula credited the city’s recent switch to the Virginia Retirement System for boosting recruitment, and he noted last year’s collective bargaining agreements that require a minimum of 3.25% across-the-board raises. For comparison, the current FY25 budget allocated a 4% raise for all city employees, and the FY24 budget included an 8% raise for most employees.
Regarding selective raises, Avula said he would not support raises for union workers and not nonunion workers, nor would he support restricting raises from higher paid positions.
“I will never support disparate raises for union versus nonunion. Whatever we’re doing for unionized employees we’re going to be doing for employees across the board,” he said. “I have the real situation of having to compete in a market. If we are treating our employees, even our senior employees, differently than the state or surrounding counties, we’re going to lose out on talent.”
Avula acknowledged that the budget includes his own pay raise, with the mayor’s salary set to increase from about $130,000 to $175,000. Councilmembers’ salaries are also set to increase, by $20,000 to $45,000 per member. Officials have said salaries for Richmond’s elected officials have remained largely unchanged for two decades and the higher mayor’s salary still falls below where it would be with cost-of-living adjustments over the past 20 years.
In attendance at Wednesday’s meeting was Councilmember Reva Trammell, whose Eighth District also makes up part of Richmond’s Southside. At Monday’s hearing on councilmembers’ proposed amendments to the budget, Trammell defended the higher salaries for the city’s top employees.
“I’m sick of hearing $200,000, $300,000. They work seven days a week,” Trammell said Monday.
Since Avula presented the budget in late March, council has held several budget workshops that stretched hours longer than originally scheduled. The additional time was requested by Abubaker, Gibson and others who maintained that the process should allow more time for council to review the budget document and suggest changes. Avula agreed when Abubaker reiterated that Wednesday.
“Part of the problem being on council,” she told the mayor, “is that we get a 605-page document and we’ve got essentially 10 days to do this analysis, and quite frankly, it’s my understanding it’s not always done.”
An additional budget workshop is scheduled Monday at 1 p.m. to resume discussions about council’s proposed amendments. Amendments are to be introduced at a meeting May 5 at 4 p.m., and a final public hearing is to be held May 12, when council is expected to vote on the budget. State law requires the city to adopt a budget before July 1, the start of the fiscal year.
Well, this is a perfect example of how and why so few people have any faith or trust in the govt. At the end of the day, money aside, the best and brightest don’t want anything to do with these people or get a job in the govt. They stay in the private sector, be way more successful and do all they can to avoid interacting with the govt at all.
Obvious disdain for public workers and disrespect of them does not help. Most people that work for local governments are hard working and want to help other citizens. They are doing the best they can with the resources they have been given.
But when people treat them badly it really does have an impact on them. Often times much more than the pay.
From the standpoint of perception, people are either part of the problem or part of the solution. Most people that work for local government are working a job. They’re not choosing an employer for the purpose of helping society. They’re choosing a job for the same reasons you and I do. If they align themselves with an entity that has a perception of being mismanaged, bumbling, incompetent, etc., and if that entity is taxpayer funded, then de facto they are part of the problem.
So no one ever goes to a job with the intent of accepting a challenge to fix things? Doing their best to fix things? You are just ready to write off anyone who ever gets hired by Richmond as “part of the problem”?
To me making blanket judgements without even getting to know someone is the real problem.
I would argue it is not the majority but as the councilmember is arguing those making over $150k. You are talking a lot of appointed, at will positions of person like the past utility director that are NOT hired based on skill set or accomplishments but for political or other reasons. And they no longer had to live in the city too. No one said the men driving the DPW trucks clearing the snow, pulling the lines for DPU fixing street lights or the fire fighter don’t deserve the raise it is the leadership that is the issue.
I’ve dealt / am dealing with people in city hall right now. Regardless of whether they are good, hard working people, the collective IQ of them is less than room temperature.
Just so unnecessary. I get it you have the highest IQ in Richmond. Congrats. Now use that IQ to procure find some empathy.
You’re free to leave at any time.
I have no problem with raises, especially if they are based on performance. For example, if a department got exceptional feedback from citizens, it would be eligible for additional funds. But what is frustrating in the city is that you feel like you are paying a premium and getting really subpar performance. Look at the daily parade of embarrassment coming out of city hall. Finance department. Debit card fiasco. Cream puff exit packages. Etc. These people just got 40% increases two years ago! And the lived experience is not that the city is there fighting for me. The lived experience… Read more »
100%
Agree completely. I would want an audit of existing $200K + salaried employees to evaluate their performance AND qualifications (do they have the experience and degrees needed for the role?) before increases are given. We don’t want a new term coined by saying some crisis was “April Binghamed” because there was a person in charge without the qualifications to handle the role.
So well said…but don’t forget the thefts and misappropriation of funds.
It’s fine to want to offer competitive salaries, comparable to surrounding cities and counties IF and AS LONG as Richmond’s performance is comparable. Unfortunately, Richmond is broken. Avula has a helluva task in front of him to fix things.. Fixing ain’t gonna happen by throwing money at managers. A huge aspect of mismanagement in RVA for years has been zero accountability. If Avula wants to reward those who work so hard, then reward them for measurable accomplishment – not for hours spent. He should be getting with each department and developing a list of 5-10 priority goals that everyone agrees… Read more »
“I’m sick of hearing $200,000, $300,000. They work seven days a week,” Trammell said Monday.
Then change them from salaried to hourly and demand they account for the hours.
Solved.
We have more money says the Mayor so let’s spend it. My property taxes have risen on average 11% per annum for the last 5 years. Sure my real estate value has gone up but my cash flow and lifestyle have have gone down. In the meantime, the fences in my City of Richmond neighborhood park are in tatters, The grass has not been fertilized or seeded in years,the Utility Department “forgot: to send me a bill in April so now I have a large bill for May and my City of Richmond online my Gov account addresses me as… Read more »
What is strange is I have checked the city’s street paving budget and it’s only going to be 12 million this year compared to 20 and 30 million to repave the streets. Also the city funds for new sidewalks hasn’t really changed at 21 million.
Personally if the city’s budget went up by 50 million they could have built tons more sidewalks and repairs and at least done 30 to 40 million in street paving.
As for a $1.20 tax rate I do think Richmond does need to start bringing it down.
It has always been that 80% of the city budget is personnel salaries and benefits.
The drop in paving is that was all done with Covid funds that are gone so the annual budget will fall for that and under capital/maintenance items.
I had high hopes for Mayor Avula! Realizing he’s only been in office for four months, I reserve my opinions on him until further on down the road. The city employees have been overpaid and under-qualified for years. A raise, and/or bonuses should be given upon proven merit, experience and qualifications. “Across the board” raises should never happen. Employees should have an annual or bi-annual review to ensure a raise/bonus is appropriate. A 3.25% cost of living increase is much higher than many on fixed incomes, yet, taxes continue to increase exponentially. Let’s get real with these city employees who… Read more »
There’s a multi-million dollar deficit due to the State not paying PILOT fees. Put a few of the 280K Assistant Directors of Operations at the General Assembly and have them lobby – everyday for the money. When Spanberger wins hit her office up daily. I’m sick and tired of VCU and the State freeloading while my tax bill and everyone that owns a home goes up.
How about merit increases for those higher level tied to goals like I don’t answering the phone at least 33% of the time when the call is external, processing a citizen complaint or problem with your agency within say 15 days, oh I do not know addressing FOIA instead of fighting them. PS anyone seen if say DPU or DPW deputies make compared to their county counterparts??