The Docket

The Docket: Local court roundup for 3.9.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

Chesterfield County claims damages of $16 million from the company contracted to restore Falling Creek Reservoir. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 3.2.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

A construction firm claims $1 million in damages, alleging it was defamed by a company it has never done business with. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 2.23.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

A chief technology officer says his former firm has falsely accused him violating non-compete provisions and denied his profit-sharing, and claims $2.6 million in damages. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 12.16.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

A diner says she became catastrophically ill after consuming a sandwich she was assured was gluten-free, and claims $1.8 million in damages. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 2.9.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

An insurer claims a transportation company owes $72,000 for workers’ comp and liability policies. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 2.2.23

stock henricoCounty court3

A seafood packager claims $10 million in damages from a fire it says was caused by negligent design and construction work. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 1.26.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

A realty company says a home repairs firm fraudulently billed it for work not done, and seeks $200,000 in damages. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 1.19.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

A couple claim their longtime accounting group failed to correct errors pointed out by the IRS in a return involving a conservation easement, and seek $400,000 in damages. (BizSense Pro subscription required)

The Docket: Local court roundup for 1.12.23

Richmond lawsuits of the week

The buyer of a Shockoe Bottom apartment property says the property contains only 25 units, instead of the 27 represented in the contract, decreasing its value. (BizSense Pro subscription required)