Health-care reform brings new taxes

Millions more Americans will have greater access to health care, but somebody has to pay for it.

The health-care reform bill signed by President Obama last week brings with it new excise taxes on the medical device and pharmaceutical industries.

The bill also tacks on a 10 percent tax onto tanning salon services.

Many in the medical industry see the new taxes as a direct threat to their businesses, while others are more optimistic that more Americans being able to afford health care will increase sales.

Wayne Sale, the owner of a Henrico-based medical supply distributor Health First who heads up a national trade group that opposes the tax, says he expects manufacturers to pass the cost to him.

“It directly affects me because my manufacturers have to take it on to the bottom line,” said Sale. “Now they will sell me what they sell for $25 for $28 to make up the difference.”

Sale sells wheelchairs, breathing aides, lift chairs and other devices. Most of his business deals with Medicare, and he is paid by third-party insurers.

The 2.3 percent sales tax on manufacturers is scheduled to go into effect in 2013. Then it is expected to generate $20 billion annually to help pay for the $940 billion of federal spending on health care planned for the next 10 years.

Sale thinks the tax will eventually cost his industry jobs. He does not expect an increase in customers who qualify for Medicare and Medicaid to offset increased costs created by the tax.

“Medicare has prices set, so I compete on service, not on price. If my cost of acquiring the equipment is higher and my reimbursement is lower, my earnings are lower. That is what I have to look forward to,” he said.

Sale said he might have to let some of his 40 employees go in that case. Industry wide, he expects 100,000 jobs to be lost within three years of the tax going into effect.

Richmond is also home to one of the country’s major medical suppliers, Owens & Minor. But the company did not return calls by press time.

The bill also brings a tax on the pharmaceutical industry. Beginning in 2011, drug makers will be subject to a $2.5 billion annual excise tax that will rise to $4.2 billion by 2018. The tax is based on a company’s market share.

Meanwhile at the growing biotech park, the bill might be a blessing, because more people will have insurance to pay for new devices/technologies.

Bob Skunda, chief executive of the Virginia BioTech Park, is optimistic that the taxes will not affect the growth of companies at the park or his ability to attract foreign investment to the park.

“[The bill will] increase market opportunity for companies that sell pharmaceuticals and medical devices,” said Skunda. “The large and significant expansion in the market of insured individuals more than compensates for less reimbursement.”

But whether the increase in customers defrays the tax won’t be clear for a number of years, he said.

“I think as far as an individual company in the research park that may be in this business, they are overall looking at this as an opportunity but are a bit more cautious,” Skunda said.

Al Harris is a BizSense reporter. Please send news tips to [email protected]

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "Health-care reform brings new taxes"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

As an IT business owner with several health care clients I had decided to put any hiring on hold during the last administration. Now with the changes the current administration and Congress have implemented I”ll be making that permanent. What a shame, I could really use the help.

Ryan Charles

Did anyone who supported this bill seriously not see this coming? Of course with more people covered there will be higher costs (and wait times).
This is the first time in our free history that our federal government is mandating that we purchase a good or service. If we simply accept this, what will they tell us to do next? Please think, people!


What a surprise. Taxes, coming out of a democrat party law? Gee, who would have ever expected THAT.

Kent Brockwell
How is this not a direct violation of the 10th Amendment? Really?!? Honestly, what are the odds that Barry Hussein and the Dopes of the Hill all skipped that day of law school? Does everyone need health insurance? No. They need health care. Why don’t they get health care? They need insurance to get health care. Why don’t they have insurance? It’s too expensive. Why is it too expensive? The insurance companies can charge what ever they want. Why? I don’t know and the insurance companies won’t tell us in less than 1,200 pages of lawyerspeak. Here’s an idea. Take… Read more »

One further step towards a civilized society. The healthcare in the US still have a long way to go before it is somewhat human and functioning, but thanks to Obama we are going in the right direction. I am shocked that so few americans has seen how expensive and dysfunctional the US healthcare system is compared with systems overseas. More taxes? Yes, you are d–m right it is needed to facilitate a working healthcare system treating ALL people.