Local bank exits TARP program

CF11Another Richmond bank is out from under the TARP.

C&F Bank this week bought its way out of the remaining $10 million it received from the U.S. Treasury in 2009 as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

It’s the second locally based bank to be free from TARP.

One of the few local banks to remain profitable throughout the recession, C&F took $20 million in TARP capital in January 2009. It repaid half in July.

As it did with the first $10 million, C&F used cash from its normal operations to fund the repayment, according to CFO Tom Cherry.

“We’re glad to be out of it,” Cherry said. “In particular, we’re pleased that we didn’t have to raise additional capital to do it.”

C&F and its $928 million West Point-based parent C&F Financial Corp. join Union First Market Bank as the only local institutions to be completely out from under the often controversial TARP program.

Between 2008 and 2009, eight local banks participated in the program, receiving a combined $191 million. In exchange, the banks gave the government thousands of shares of their stock.

Five local banks have yet to buy their way out: Central Virginia Bank ($11.3 million), Essex Bank ($17.6 million), EVB ($24 million), First Capital Bank ($10.9 million) and Village Bank and Trust ($14.7 million).

Union First Market Bank exited the program late last year.

Created amid the financial crisis, the TARP Capital Purchase Program was intended to provide capital to healthy banks of all sizes to help them weather the storm of the recession.

In exchange, banks gave up shares of preferred stock that the Treasury holds until the money is paid back. Banks pay a 5 percent quarterly dividend to the Treasury for the first five years. If the loan is not repaid after five years, the interest rate jumps to 9 percent.

Because the Capital Purchase Program was part of the TARP, it was widely labeled a “bailout” when it was introduced. And many bankers have been wary of the stigma.

“In hindsight, I don’t think it was worth it,” Cherry said. “The initial intent [from the government] was ‘we’re giving these funds to the strongest banks.’ Shortly thereafter, they made it sound like it was a bad thing to have it.”

But the extra cash did give C&F a buffer, he said.

“It kept our capital very strong during the crisis, whereas we didn’t have to cut back on lending,” Cherry said.

The Treasury Department still holds the right to own 167,000 shares of C&F common stock that were also issued as part of the TARP deal.

The bank said it would negotiate with the government to repurchase those warrants.

 

 

 

CF11Another Richmond bank is out from under the TARP.

C&F Bank this week bought its way out of the remaining $10 million it received from the U.S. Treasury in 2009 as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

It’s the second locally based bank to be free from TARP.

One of the few local banks to remain profitable throughout the recession, C&F took $20 million in TARP capital in January 2009. It repaid half in July.

As it did with the first $10 million, C&F used cash from its normal operations to fund the repayment, according to CFO Tom Cherry.

“We’re glad to be out of it,” Cherry said. “In particular, we’re pleased that we didn’t have to raise additional capital to do it.”

C&F and its $928 million West Point-based parent C&F Financial Corp. join Union First Market Bank as the only local institutions to be completely out from under the often controversial TARP program.

Between 2008 and 2009, eight local banks participated in the program, receiving a combined $191 million. In exchange, the banks gave the government thousands of shares of their stock.

Five local banks have yet to buy their way out: Central Virginia Bank ($11.3 million), Essex Bank ($17.6 million), EVB ($24 million), First Capital Bank ($10.9 million) and Village Bank and Trust ($14.7 million).

Union First Market Bank exited the program late last year.

Created amid the financial crisis, the TARP Capital Purchase Program was intended to provide capital to healthy banks of all sizes to help them weather the storm of the recession.

In exchange, banks gave up shares of preferred stock that the Treasury holds until the money is paid back. Banks pay a 5 percent quarterly dividend to the Treasury for the first five years. If the loan is not repaid after five years, the interest rate jumps to 9 percent.

Because the Capital Purchase Program was part of the TARP, it was widely labeled a “bailout” when it was introduced. And many bankers have been wary of the stigma.

“In hindsight, I don’t think it was worth it,” Cherry said. “The initial intent [from the government] was ‘we’re giving these funds to the strongest banks.’ Shortly thereafter, they made it sound like it was a bad thing to have it.”

But the extra cash did give C&F a buffer, he said.

“It kept our capital very strong during the crisis, whereas we didn’t have to cut back on lending,” Cherry said.

The Treasury Department still holds the right to own 167,000 shares of C&F common stock that were also issued as part of the TARP deal.

The bank said it would negotiate with the government to repurchase those warrants.

 

 

 

This story is for our paid subscribers only. Please become one of the thousands of BizSense Pro readers today!

Your subscription has expired. Renew now by choosing a subscription below!

For more informaiton, head over to your profile.

Profile


SUBSCRIBE NOW

 — 

 — 

 — 

TERMS OF SERVICE:

ALL MEMBERSHIPS RENEW AUTOMATICALLY. YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR A 1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL AT THE RATE IN EFFECT AT THAT TIME UNLESS YOU CANCEL YOUR MEMBERSHIP BY LOGGING IN OR BY CONTACTING [email protected].

ALL CHARGES FOR MONTHLY OR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS ARE NONREFUNDABLE.

EACH MEMBERSHIP WILL ONLY FUNCTION ON UP TO 3 MACHINES. ACCOUNTS ABUSING THAT LIMIT WILL BE DISCONTINUED.

FOR ASSISTANCE WITH YOUR MEMBERSHIP PLEASE EMAIL [email protected]




Return to Homepage

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
james
james
12 years ago

Good for C&F. They seem to have the opinion most banks have — it wasn’t worth it. Treasury still has a hold over them with those shares. Hopefully they can get out from under that soon as well.