Council moves the chains on Redskins deal

Redskins training camp rendering

A rendering of the planned Redskins training camp facility. (Courtesy of Bon Secours)

The multimillion-dollar deal between the city and Bon Secours to help make the Washington Redskins training camp a reality in Richmond took another big step Monday night.

The city council approved a proposal that would finance the Redskins facility behind the Virginia Museum of Science, despite opposition from neighborhood residents and two council members.

The final vote was 6-2. Council member Bruce Tyler of the West End, who has publicly opposed the deal, and Chris Hilbert, who represents Northside, voted against.

The multifaceted deal includes a major investment from Bon Secours sought by the city and a piece of West End real estate that the health-care organization has eyed for years.

Bon Secours will pay for naming rights on the Redskins facility on DMV Drive and Leigh Street and a 10-year lease on an office building attached to the new fields, a deal valued at almost $6.5 million. The Richmond Economic Development Authority will develop the 17-acre property, which is owned by the state, to bypass some of the procurement processes that the city would have to go through. Development could cost as much as $10 million, according to city estimates.

Monday’s vote means that city council gave its approval, in principal, to the general framework of the deal orchestrated by Mayor Dwight Jones. All the construction, including the Redskins training camp fields, will still have to be approved through the special use permit process, as will the financing.

Westhampton School property

The Westhampton School property near Libbie and Patterson avenues. (Photo by David Larter)

In a public comment session Monday that lasted well over an hour, more than a dozen people spoke out against the deal, citing a lack of community input, especially a piece of the deal that gives Bon Secours long-term use of the city-owned Westhampton School property at Libbie and Patterson avenues.

The arrangement, which grants Bon Secours use of four acres of the Westhampton School property for a planned 75,000-sqauare-foot medical facility, came under fire from Councilman Tyler last week and at Monday’s meeting.

Tyler, who represents the West End neighborhood where the Westhampton property is located, called it a “back-room deal.”

At Monday’s meeting, Tyler said residents in his district are not opposed to the Redskins training camp.

“I don’t think I got one email saying ‘I don’t want the Redskins to come here,’” Tyler said. “What I got was ‘we don’t like how this deal came together.’”

Tyler moved to have the Westhampton School property stripped from the resolution in order to allow the members of his district a chance to fully voice their opinions.

The city offered Bon Secours four acres of the Westhampton School property for 60 years at $5,000 a year.

Tyler’s proposed amendment was voted down 6-2 after Council President Kathy Graziano explained that that would not work.

“This is a package,” Graziano said. “If we remove one of the pieces of that package, we don’t have a deal.”

For its end of the deal, Bon Secours in addition to the estimated $6.5 million for the athletic complex and the eventual Westhampton facility, committed to building an $8.5 million expansion of its Richmond Community Hospital on the East End. The city is looking to increase citizens’ access to medical care in that part of town.

Bon Secours estimates the total package should add 200 jobs in the city.

Two acres of city-owned athletic fields at the western edge of the Westhampton property would also have to be maintained by Bon Secours as part of arrangement. The city would retain ownership of the fields.

Councilman Charles Samuels, who represents the district where the Redskins facility is planned, said he would insist that Bon Secours preserve the historic school building.

“I think we all know that Bon Secours is an organization that does quite well for themselves,” Samuels said at the meeting. “I think we need to make clear as we go forward that this is a building that shall be preserved. Not ‘We’d like it if you would,’ not ‘It would be nice if you could.’ It shall be preserved.”

Rich Johnson, chief executive of the Wilton Companies and chairman of the city’s Economic Development Authority, praised the deal at the meeting, saying that it was “virtually guaranteed to be a success,” since the agreement with Bon Secours covered almost 80 percent of the development costs up front.

“This is a very safe investment,” Johnson said.

Leave a Reply

4 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
CharlesBrettWillFrank SmithAMY Hopkin Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
AMY Hopkin
AMY Hopkin

I think Bruce Tyler’s attack on the SIsters of Bon Scours was deplorable…they give so much to our community. Clearly he has his own AGENDA


Tyler was right on. Also, Bon Secours can drop the non-profit bs. Everyone in Richmond knows that the vast majority of people who can’t pay for care aren’t getting treatment at the “non-profit” Bon Secours hospitals, they are sent to VCU.

Frank Smith
Frank Smith

Will, you are missing the point, in your division of class argument. Bon Secours is and has been a very responsible corporate citizen when it comes to looking after the underprivileged – that’s the way they started.

Yes, you will find their competitor, HCA is also “charitable,” but not to the extent that Bon Secours is.

I have had the opportunity to live near three different Bon Secour facilities over the years, including the founding hospital in Michigan. They are a good neighbor.

Curious though, that no one has made the argument about what government is doing promoting business?



They may be great in Michigan but I don’t see much community engagement in Richmond. This project is proof of that. The only reason they are improving service in the needy east end community is because they got a great deal on a nice piece of property in the west end that they were drooling over.


Rendering seems minimal but I’m sure it’s just the beginning. Will they fit everything (gift shop, snack bar, Bon Secours facilities, locker rooms, etc) in that one building? Also, don’t they realize most citizens that don’t live nearby are having a coronary wondering Where Will I Park?!?!? Something else to think about, people will be lined up along that fence trying to see RG3 while attempting to dodge traffic. They better cover it. On a positive note I want to say this is one of the better deals Richmond has done in a while. Giving up a school seems like… Read more »


I wonder if anyone is thinking that’s the future home for VCU football?